Assignment 6 – Transitions – Rework

The following Rework is based on my tutor (link) - Assignment 6 – Tutor feedback Updated text based on annotated feedback with a focus on referencing improvements including references to typology and a Paul Davis essay defining it. Updated ALL site 3 images to ensure tighter alignment Grid view created for Site 1, 2 & 3... Continue Reading →

A6 – Suggested Research Typology

Notes from - Can the photographic typology be defined? - By Paul Davis. 2017 Typology : a system of dividing things into different types - Oxford dictionary. Where as a photographic typology should have the ability to reshape perception or focus of every day objects into an art form.  This process is often cold and... Continue Reading →

Assignment 6 – Tutor feedback

Feedback from my tutor for assignment 6- Issues in blue, my comments in red. Overall Comments • Well submitted google drive (after bit of ‘e-mail tennis’ tweaking) which is organised and clear for assessment. • Well considered ‘Typology’ of changes that Chinese Landscape undergoes over an extended period of time. Do make a reference and... Continue Reading →

Assignment 5 – Things are Looking Up – Rework

Remake based on my tutor feedback. Updated text - Artist statement/Evaluation upon review of feedback notes Added - Breton Reference / Colberg note / Aleksandr Rodchenko reference Reorganised book text to the back of the book with error corrections Brief  Produce 12 photographs exploring an alter Artist Statement (introduction in book) For anyone who has... Continue Reading →

A5 – Suggested Research – Rodchenko

My tutor gave me a PDF document entitled  Revolutionary Photography by Christina Lodder. The premise for the article is that 35 mm cameras were responsable for creating a wave of creative photographers who had be hamperd by large slate style cameras. The article discusses how avant-garde photographers in Russia in the 1920s and 30s  would... Continue Reading →

A5 – Suggested Research – Jorg Colberg

Revisiting Colberg for the purpose of extracting some referencing of my sequencing should be straight foward. His main points outlined in the book are as follows. Run the edit by at least one other pair of eyes. Don’t consult an ever larger number of people: editing by committee never works. Let go of ‘important’ photographs... Continue Reading →

Assignment 5 – Tutors feedback

Feedback for A5 with my comments in RED  Overall Comments Very well organised G-Drive submission with clear evaluation, artist’s statement and original project proposal. Avoid over-confusing though, with different naming (‘David Leverett A5 Assessment Criteria’ for your evaluation) and the inclusion of ‘link to Online Gallery’ and ‘Background Research _ Technical review’ as this could... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started